borth@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoYou have 1 wish...sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square77linkfedilinkarrow-up11.47Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.45Karrow-down1imageYou have 1 wish...sh.itjust.worksborth@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square77linkfedilink
minus-squareguyrocket@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down3·2 years agoIt can handle more than a million rows so why not?
minus-squareeezeebee@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 years agoA million rows sounds like a lot until you need more than that
minus-squareAnamnesis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 years agoIn my experience it doesn’t work well when you have more than a couple people editing the file. My company had a group of ten modifying the same file in live time; it led to huge desync problems.
It can handle more than a million rows so why not?
A million rows sounds like a lot until you need more than that
Database2.xlsx
Database2_not_locked(1).xlsx
In my experience it doesn’t work well when you have more than a couple people editing the file. My company had a group of ten modifying the same file in live time; it led to huge desync problems.