How’d you make your text pink like that?

Welcome!

Are we federated with db0?

!rpgmemes@ttrpg.network is my only one

I was referring to this

As of now it’d be unwise to post controversial NSFW (like Loli), but I’ll give an update in the future when it won’t be as risky.

Is this a rule or a suggestion?

I appreciate the encouragement, but I am just an observer here doing my best to be supportive

Is there a biastophilia community here?

The combination of “MAP” not being in all caps and the pencil really had me thinking this was a map fetish flag. Vexillogy taken to a whole new level!

I wonder if this is the first DMCA based defederation.

Legality in the US is a little unclear, in their defense. That being said, it is probably just signaling.

For those not in the know:

Boost was a mobile app for Reddit. The developer has stopped support for the Reddit app (which no longer is functional) and has began creating an app for Lemmy. You can set it to automatically download from the play store when its released. It was supposed to be released by the end of August but there were some bugs to hammer out, they said the plan is to release a beta this week. You can follow updates on https://lemmy.world/c/BoostForLemmy or by just checking their account https://lemmy.world/u/rmayayo.

I’m waiting for Boost. Otherwise, Jerboa seems to work fine enough!

Exactly this. Regardless of how you think treatment for these identities should be addressed, there’s no reason to assume they’re LARPing. This is the same rhetoric used by trans(gender)phobes.

For the lazy, I guess this passage is why the page was linked:

It is believed that all or most pro-contact individuals are actively seeking CSAM/CSEM or sexual/romantic relationships with young people. In reality, many separate their ideology and what they believe to be a reasonable course of action for the present. Some pro-contacts refrain from predatory behavior because they do not want to risk legal or social repercussions, although they support decriminalization and destigmatization of such actions. Some refrain because they believe that in a society which criminalizes or stigmatizes such behavior, youth will likely be harassed and maltreated by authority figures or other members of their social circle if an older individual’s sexual involvement with them is found out. Some pro-contacts believe that in a society which criminalizes or stigmatizes such behavior, disapproving outsiders will likely “gaslight” a youth into retroactively considering the relationship or interactions abusive and traumatic, or cause pressure which makes it difficult for the older party to carry out a healthy relationship, so they do not see it as “worth the trouble.” Other pro-contacts are not personally interested in CSAM/CSEM or relationships with young people, but still believe other people should be permitted to carry out such behavior. Just because someone does not plan on sexually or romantically engaging with youth does not mean that they are necessarily anti-contact.

I’m not sure to what extent pro-c people actually do any c-ing versus just believing that it should be legal. Does anyone know?

I don’t agree with pro-c’ers, but I’m not sure to what extent the latter is problematic. I guess being “problematic” is subjective, so anything you strongly disagree with is then “problematic.” From a more objective perspective, though, the latter does not cause any harm*, so I wouldn’t call it that.

*There is a caveat here: perhaps being vocally pro-c would encourage others to actually c. I don’t know.

Same, if the no port-forwarding thing isn’t a big deal for you. They also have vouchers on Amazon which is great for privacy.

Unliked your own comment, what a move

We had a !discussions@burggit.moe post a while ago about allowing a MAP community on burggit. I think ultimately it was decided that it would have to be too restrictive to be of interest to any of its potential users. Hopefully the interested parties see this post. Good luck!

Yes, I personally am a huge fan of the taste of sunscreen 😭