That it’d be great if we lived in a fluffy world of perfection, but in the real world, things aren’t quite as simple. You can never assume an actor is or even desires do be logical, nor that people will gladly behave with others’ interest at heart

And then the fluffy unicorns join the care bears in a happy dance

Surprise: as soon as you form a community, the most dependable members become a governing core. What the fuck do you think a “village elder” is?

Also, what happens when village A decides their neighbours B don’t deserve all of their land? There’s no governing body to mediate, so village A simply attacks B.

Sure – state healthcare, state infrastructure, state base income all help.

Wow, your little brainlet really got triggered, huh?

Says the rightwing scum getting shunned wherever they go.

For one, the fact their work (which took significantly less time) lead to a real, objective difference and benefit in their society. There’s also the fact that anyone not enslaved had partial or complete ownership of their lands. Not to be underestimated, as well, is the fact their society wasn’t immediately doomed to collapse from worldwide catastrophes.

The place of trucks in logistics is in hell, delivering coal.

My guy, you’re the one getting triggered for being called a pencil-dicked truck driver.

Also

the image of someone driving around enjoying their vehicle that sets off a need to bully

Absolutely - any moron using an american truck at this point in time deserves to be bullied into having some decency and behaving with civility. Of course, I don’t expect much from americans.

the possibility it has for threatening traditional power structures.

You mean the possibility of completely collapsing civilization as a whole.

We have a state now though, has thievery and violence been stopped?

Fallacious reasoning, and pretty obvious at that. I give you a cup of water - some water has been poisoned by heavy metals. If you drink the cup of water, will you get metal poisoning? The only intellectually honest answer is: the question is flawed. The same way it doesn’t follow that
Some water is poisoned ⇏ All water is poisoned
It also doesn’t follow that
The suppression of violence begets control ⇏ All control suppresses violence.

This is further proven by your following statement

What is the difference between the conditions where it is common and uncommon?

Which opposes your own argumentation.

Good luck keeping order without an entity for keeping order.

Anarchism is simply opposition to hierarchies that allow control over others, such as the control capitalists have over workers

Or the control the hierarchical entity (state) must have over a populous to stop thievery and violence. Even in a perfectly idealized world, anarchism only just barely gets to work, teetering on the brink of collapse.

He might be a grower, don’t discount him just yet.

Except they would, because nobody gives a shit he’s got a pencil dick - but in their own heads they think someone actually cares, which is what drives their impulse of overcompensating.

I don’t think there are pills. You either have the genes or don’t. Although I just now hypothesized culture may have an effect, but what could unify Japanese and American men as being smaller, yet separate South Europeans as being bigger, for instance?

Nobody gives a shit about the size of your junk. The point is that the sort of person who would buy an american pickup truck is so insecure, they want to overcompensate what they perceive as being an obvious flaw.

Says the guy whose manhood is so tiny and who’s so insecure about their sexuality, they need to buy shit to not feel so bad about themselves.

In many aspects, yes, they did lead a more fulfilling life.

Rightwingers don’t need to imagine it :)

They’re literally sitting on mountains-full of excavated natural diamonds.