Hey all :D I read a post on Tumblr recently, though I can’t find it again, but I’m curious to know how you guys feel about the idea of encouraging transid folks to remove the trans- prefix from their ids if they want to, since it’s their identity.

So, for example, someone who is not diagnosed autistic and doesn’t fit the autism diagnostic criteria, but is transautistic, could say they are autistic because of their transid. I’m not debating the validity of their feelings because I support it 100% without doubt, but I do think language is important in communication and have some mixed feelings about it, especially considering how niche our community is and how literally nobody else uses cis- language outside of gender (it is just assumed that cisautistics are naturally autistic). I also don’t think it is a good idea to give transids a 1:1 comparison to transgender ids, as things rarely are so directly comparable, though I do accept a lot of rhetoric and backlash against transids in support of transgender is hypocritical.

When it comes to gender, it’s perfectly acceptable to go stealth and encourage others to see you as a gender without them knowing you transitioned. Although we like to use transgender as an example a lot, I feel transids are just not the same. If I told others I am Japanese, because I feel as though I should be and long for my self image to match it, I feel that would be lying since I am not Japanese in my body or my background. I have never even been to Japan! I also would be afraid of backlash in none-rq circles once it is found out I’m trace, not physically Japanese.

I just think the idea is interesting yet flawed, and am curious to know if others feel similarly or totally disagree.

  • pandaOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok that’s a perspective I hadn’t actually considered, thank you. I’ve never thought about my species to be transspecies, I just am a red panda therian. I suppose in our current society, race is much more delicate ground than species.