• Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My point was that my proposed wording would say that “they can if they want to” and not “they shouldn’t even if they want to” because that’s what your wording implifies. I added a second sentence because I assumed you may be actually be against drinking milk at all for personal reasons or something.

        • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How do you think they feel about being forcibly impregnated over and over and over again? And having their children taken away from them each time?

          • Dkarma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Cows don’t have agency. Also you just moved the goalposts from milking to forced pregnancy.

            • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Cows don’t have agency.

              Correct. That’s my point.

              Also you just moved the goalposts from milking to forced pregnancy.

              Cows don’t produce milk unless they’re kept pregnant. You can’t have one without the other.

              • Dkarma@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You can absolutely have milk without forced pregnancy. Your assertion is simply a lie.