• Eq0@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, there should be rules to benefit the poor. But many of the laws now in effect in particular in the US are specifically not built for that. So many laws would better be dropped than enforced, and many are missing.

    • MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why there should be rules to benefit the poor, as opposed minimalistic neutral rules beneficial to the whole society and safety net like UBI? (that what libertarian would argue)