• irmoz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s just a cop out. Of course it’s complex. No reason to just throw your hands in the air and say “it’s too hard, let’s just leave it to the market”. We already tried that. It led to this.

    Also, no one is saying, literally, “building more houses will fix homelessness alone, nothing else needed, DURRR”. That’s just a strawman.

    What we also need is a complete end to landlording. But this of course won’t happen under the current system, because capitalism fucking worships private property.

    • kittenbridgeasteroid@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The entire post is about low income housing as a solution to people sleeping in tents. Building more apartments won’t stop people from living in tents.

      Pointing out that it’s a complex issue that isn’t solved by more houses is pretty much the opposite of a strawman

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, that is not the point it’s making. It’s making the point that neoliberal chuds would prefer to see homeless people than affordable housing. It doesn’t say that building housing itself is the sole solution. Hell, it doesn’t say anything at all about building. We don’t see any construction in that picture, the blocks are just there. You could read it as saying that already built flats should just be given to people.